Kathmandu, 4 June 2025
Due to the lack of proper consultation with civil society organizations, the transitional justice process in Nepal faces a serious legitimacy crisis. The recent appointment of officials to the two transitional justice commissions has, in general, failed to establish credibility. It is our considered position that the manner in which these officials have been appointed cannot advance this complex and sensitive process in a just and trustworthy manner.
We also unequivocally state that ignoring, dismissing, or showing persistent intolerance toward the legitimate concerns raised by victims—even before the appointments were made—and attempting to create and exploit divisions among them is yet another attempt to continue derailing the transitional justice process.
This process can move forward only if it earns the trust of the victims’ community. Otherwise, public confidence in the state will further erode, and debates around transitional justice will shift elsewhere—potentially toward models such as a Citizens’ Truth Commission or a hybrid transitional justice mechanism. We urge all responsible stakeholders to be mindful of this risk.
The sudden publication of a notice to collect complaints—without any regard for the sensitivity of victims of rape and sexual violence, their psychosocial condition, socioeconomic barriers, privacy, and dignity—and the failure to respond sensitively even after serious concerns were raised by victims and rights-holder groups; the disrespectful statements by Commission officials attacking the self-esteem and dignity of victims; and the absence of any effort to restore meaningful consultation with victims, all while strategically pushing for a mechanical approach—together send a clear message: commissions formed without credible appointments cannot earn legitimacy, nor can they be effective or meaningful. Instead, they will only repeat past blunders, wasting the country’s precious resources and time.
We therefore strongly urge the Government of Nepal to immediately take the necessary steps to engage in dialogue, consultation, and deliberation with victims’ communities—who have repeatedly expressed their disagreement with the manner of appointments—in order to identify an appropriate solution and restore the legitimacy of the transitional justice process.
We also urge the international community and the United Nations not to provide any financial or technical assistance, as in the past, to the government and/or the transitional justice commissions that have lost legitimacy—unless the government brings the process back on track, starting from the point where victims began to lose trust. Any support should be conditional on the guarantee that victims’ self-esteem, participation, ownership, and satisfaction are placed at the heart of the process.
Signatories:
- Accountability Watch Committee (AWC)
- Advocacy Forum-Nepal (AF)
- Amnesty International Nepal
- Collective Campaign for Peace (COCAP)
- Forum for Women, Law and Development (FWLD)
- Forum of Women Journalists and Communicators (Sancharika Samuha)
- Himalayan Human Rights Monitors- HimRights
- Human Rights for Justice
- Human Rights Organizations Nepal (HURON)
- Human Rights and Justice Centre (HRJC)
- Justice and Rights Institute Nepal (JuRI-Nepal)
- Informal Sector Service Centre (INSEC)
- Legal Aid and Consultancy Centre Nepal (LACC)
- Law and Policy Forum for Social Justice (LAPSOJ)
- Nagarik Aawaz (NA)
- National Alliance of Women Human Right Defenders
- Nepal Forum for Restorative Justice
- Nepal Peacebuilding Initiative
- Sankalpa
- Tarangini Foundation
- The Story Kitchen
- Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal (TPO)
- Voices of Women Media (VOW Media)
- Women’s Rehabilitation Center (WOREC)